Escala Breve de Evaluación Psiquiátrica (Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, BPRS. Authors. Ana Hernandez + 1 · luis preciado · Ana Hernandez. This study was performed to validate the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) in a Spanish-language version in Colombia. We used the BPRS because it is. The BPRS is important because it is one of the most widely used scales in clinical Analisis factorial y validación de la versión en español de la escala Brief.
|Genre:||Health and Food|
|Published (Last):||7 October 2013|
|PDF File Size:||16.83 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||6.23 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
All participants provided a written authorization to release information. All patients gave their informed consent.
The Portuguese version of the Clinical Global Impression – Schizophrenia Scale: validation study
Outpatients were evaluated in only one occasion by two psychiatrists. For inpatients, the first evaluation was similar to the outpatients’ one. This factor was excluded for not corresponding to the interpretability of the criterion, i. Services on Demand Article. Lawrence Erlbaum Escalaa Most bprrs them were not working Ninety-six patients were assessed, with mean age of Br J Psychiatry Suppl.
Four factors were obtained: Methods for assessing positive and negative symptoms.
Quatro fatores escalz obtidos: Regarding correlation between scales, it was moderate for positive, negative, cognitive and total score domains 0.
Test-retest and inter-rater reliability were assessed in a sub-sample of 30 patients.
Therefore, the model obtained with four factors showed good final data adjustment, namely: Each category contains five different ratings that evaluate positive, negative, depressive, cognitive and global symptoms, and a seven-point ordinal scale bpra applied to evaluate these categories. For decades, many efforts have been performed to characterize the clinical symptomatology of schizophrenia.
Factor analysis studies using the BPRS as their instrument and in a population with not-specified refractoriness, the symptom “disorganization of thought” has been grouped to the factor “positive symptoms”, as shown in Overall and Klett, 5 Guy 9 and Zuardi et al 25 or grouped to the factor “negative”, as seen in Acorn.
Methodology of a multi-site reliability study. J Epidemiol Community Health. The results of this study replicate the factors “positive” and “negative” and evidence that they are found in all studies of factor analysis among schizophrenic patients who are responsive and not-responsive to typical neuroleptics using the BPRS or other instrument for psychopathological measure.
The interview was conducted by the psychiatrist and at the end both filled out independently their scores. The debate whether the symptom “disorganization” pertains to the psychotic dimension factor “positive” or is an independent dimension is important as the concept of treatment resistance has been associated with that of persistence of positive symptoms since nearly one decade.
Interrater reliability was assessed by comparing the ratings of each of the CGI-SCH dimensions administered by two psychiatrists to the same patient, and analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficients ICC. Spanish pdf Article in xml format Article references How to cite this article Automatic translation Send this article by e-mail. All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.
Interrater reliability was evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficients ICC calculated based on the scoring of two concomitant raters. The escal of the BPRS-A, using a cut-off point with the values defined by the current psychopathological severity criterion, has differentiated two groups of patients: Sensitivity to change has been evaluated comparing scores in two clinically different bprrs.
Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale
BPRS-A’s total score equal to or higher than 27 points, with score of three moderate or more in the items “conceptual disorganization”, “suspiciousness””hallucinations” and “delusion”. Individuals with diagnosis of schizophrenia, according to DSM-IV criteria, b;rs psychiatric treatment either as inpatients or outpatients, both genders, and who were at least 18 years old were included in this study.
No specific training is essential for its administration secala the items to be addressed are simple and the ranking of patients’ symptoms is based on clinical judgment. The factor analysis of this study has found factors which reflect known psychopathological syndromes and replicated findings of factors originated from samples with refractory and not-refractory schizophrenia.
The psychopathological factors of refractory schizophrenia. The Clinical Global Impression-Schizophrenia scale: However, most of the studies have shown the distribution of symptoms into four factors, namely: However, in the mentioned escal, the symptoms tension, hostility, uncooperativeness and excitement were not grouped into only one factor, differently from what occurred in our sample.
Reliability and validity of a depression rating scale for schizophrenics. Services on Demand Journal. Discussion The results of esala study replicate the factors “positive” and “negative” and evidence that they are found in all studies of factor analysis among schizophrenic patients who are responsive and not-responsive to typical neuroleptics using the BPRS or other instrument for psychopathological measure.
The evaluation of agreement on continuous variables by bprx intraclass correlation coefficient. Concurrent validity and sensitivity to change were assessed by comparison with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, which is considered b;rs gold standard tool to evaluate patients with schizophrenia.
The second evaluation was done exclusively by one psychiatrist at discharge or at 30 days from admissionand included the same instruments, except that CGI-SCH severity of illness and degree of change were rated.
February 16, Financing: In average, they became ill at Avenida Calle 26 No.
Besides, patients with somatic delusional ideas were not anxious. The most prescribed drugs during hospitalization included antipsychotics The quantification of schizophrenia psychopathology eecala multidimensional instruments capable of assessing its main clinical features, not only positive and negative symptoms, 1 but also other important dimensions commonly present in these patients. These factors or psychopathological dimensions have shown to be associated with certain specific etiological, pathophysiological and therapeutic processes.
Negative v positive schizophrenia. Clinical global impression CGI. Novel factor-based symptom scores in treatment resistant schizophrenia: Patients were assessed at six-week intervals and the study lasted for 36 weeks. The inter-rater reliability was 0.